This article discusses the amusement tax changes presented as part of Cook County’s FY2016 Proposed Budget and the lack of support the amusement tax is seeing. It cites the Civic Federation’s analysis of the budget proposal, which could not support the budget due to the one percentage point sales tax increase. A Civic Federation blog post went into detail on the amusement tax.
This article reviews the Civic Federation’s analysis of Cook County’s FY2016 Proposed Budget. The Federation could not support the budget because the introduction and approval of a one percentage point increase in the County’s sales tax in order to increase pension funding happened outside of the budget process, and there are legal uncertainties regarding the increased pension fund contribution.
One Percentage Point Sales Tax Increase Unreasonable Given Alternatives In a report released today, the Civic Federation announced it could not support Cook County’s proposed FY2016 budget of $4.5 billion because it is based on a one percentage point increase in the County’s sales tax that will make the City of Chicago an outlier compared to other major urban centers with a composite rate of 10.25%. Most of the sales tax revenue collected in FY2016 will be dedicated to an increased…
The Civic Federation cannot support Cook County’s proposed FY2016 budget of $4.5 billion because it is based on a one percentage point increase in the County’s sales tax approved on July 15, 2015 that will make the City of Chicago an outlier compared to other major urban centers with a composite rate of 10.25%. While the Federation supports the County’s efforts to increase pension funding, the magnitude of the sales tax increase is not reasonable given the other available revenue and…
Two of the three major rating agencies have cut the State of Illinois’ bond ratings due to its ongoing budget crisis and worsening financial condition. These downgrades make Illinois the only state credit currently rated below the ‘A’ category and signal a weakened capacity for the government to meet its financial obligations. Both downgrades come on the heels of the announcement by the State Comptroller that due to year-end spending pressures and lower revenues, Illinois would be delaying…
The City of Chicago’s FY2016 budget proposes to implement a monthly solid waste removal fee of $9.50 on households, which is projected to generate $62.7 million in new revenue.[1] Currently the City of Chicago spends approximately $244 million per year on solid waste removal services. The Chicago Department of Streets and Sanitation currently provides solid waste removal services free of charge to approximately 600,000 households residing in single-family homes and apartment buildings of four…
This article reviews the Civic Federation’s analysis of the FY2016 City of Chicago Budget released October 14 in advance of a City Council hearing on the budget. The analysis supported the budget for addressing the City’s public safety pension funding crisis, but urged the City to consider greater cost savings and efficiencies to minimize the future burden on taxpayers.
This segment discusses the Civic Federation’s FY2016 City of Chicago Budget Analysis released on October 14. The analysis supported the budget for addressing the City’s public safety pension funding crisis, but warned that there is no public plan for two significant potential FY2016 expenses: inaction on Senate Bill 777 and a court ruling against the City over the phase-out of its retiree healthcare subsidy.
This article covers the Civic Federation’s October 14 analysis of the FY2016 City of Chicago budget. The Federation supports a proposed property tax hike of $544.2 million over four years to address the City’s public safety pension funding crisis, but warns greater sacrifice will be needed due to continued deficit projections for the City of Chicago, liquidity issues and future deficit projections for Chicago Public Schools, and dangerously low funded levels for the City’s non-public safety…
With Illinois operating without a budget for more than three months, concerns have arisen about whether the State is going to run out of money. The simple answer is no—at least not in the way that running out of money is typically understood. Despite the lack of a budget since fiscal year 2016 began on July 1, 2015, money is still going into the State’s checking accounts. However, this revenue can only be used if there are budgetary appropriations or other spending authority. The following…
